Saturday, July 19, 2008

Can We Be Indifferent?


I was reading Carol’s post on discrimination and stereotypes in astonishment. In my interpretation, she equates stereotyping to a major avenue to social acceptance. In addition, she also questions the idea of censoring racially derogatory language because it does nothing but “makes [discrimination] invisible.” Personally I found the analysis in this post not completely compatible with my experience. Therefore, I feel compelled to offer a few of my thoughts on the same issues in response to Carol’s post.

At the beginning of her post, the writer analyzes a video clip from Eddy’s blog and concludes that “we all discriminate and stereotype at some point in our lives.” I am in agreement. Discrimination and stereotypes often appear as generalized or falsified assumptions against a certain social group that the public lacks knowledge of. Very well illustrated in the video, children are individuals who possess limited knowledge and life experience hence tend to offer definitive, inaccurate responses to photo portrayals based on unfiltered outside influences. Nevertheless, society as a whole mostly consists of sophisticated, mature adults with well established values. Different from children, adults tend to evaluate their actions and judgments based on continuous learning and experience accumulation. As a result, I fail to come to the writer’s assumption that people choose to “continue [their] ignorance even though [they] are given the choice to become more accepting.”

Additionally, in her example the writer acknowledges her active stereotyping and considers the reason being her family upbringing, which I found interesting. People inevitably shape their first impressions about society from their first school: home. Nevertheless I believe people’s worldviews and ideologies are constantly deconstructed and reconstructed as their knowledge and experiences grow. Therefore, I have doubts about the writer’s rationale behind her decision of continuing to stereotype given that she is in constant exposure to new, well researched ideas and knowledge in higher education. Moreover, I am personally disturbed by the writer’s explanation of her action as a way to be “normal” and “socially accepted.” It would be tragic if our society had come to a point where people must acquire social acceptance at the expense of other ethnic groups. Fortunately, we are not such a community. As college students, we have a responsibility to examine today’s racial reality in America more carefully and critically. With injustice and prejudice still haunting different communities, we must remind ourselves that ignorance is not a luxury America can afford.

Lastly, the writer expresses her concerns about censorship on language against minorities, questioning if such action would make discrimination invisible. I would argue in favor of such censorship. The promotion of politically correct language should not be seen as a constraint to the freedom of speech; instead, it is an effective means to raise cultural awareness and respect. I completely believe in Carol’s good intent for an understanding world where people could be civilly open to each other about their dislikes or even hate. However history has vividly illustrated the danger of such degree of “freedom.” The Nazi orchestrated the Holocaust because of the hate for Jews. On-going genocide appears to be an everyday scene in Darfur, Sudan today because of openly pronounced hatred between ethnic groups. And America also had her share in racial hate crisis in the Japanese Internment Camp era during the Second World War. I believe in open dialogue. However as we learned from these historical lessons, openly sharing our hate, especially unfounded hate, does not seem to be the magic recipe to create understanding and love. To examine the stages of genocide, we can easily conclude that racial and cultural awareness in language is the key to the prevention of escalating hate between ethnic groups.

Sometimes I would question myself the value of a college education. Is it a diploma I can use to prove my intellectual competency? Is it the key to a financially stable life? Perhaps. But more importantly, I value the tools I have gained and the critical thinking skills I have developed in higher education because they are my light in examining the reality surrounding us, a seemingly fair, but highly racialized reality. In such reality, I fail to imagine equality being achieved by indifference and blind conformity. Nonetheless, with necessary skills and tools, one has a choice to break the silence and challenge injustices for the good of others. This is how the value of my college education is realized.

3 comments:

Christopher Schaberg said...

Rick, you have constructed a nuanced, careful response to Carol's post, and along the way you have revealed many peripheral issues that we should indeed consider.

One thing that I was struck by in Eddy's post was the treatment of the 'news' video as a cultural reflection as opposed to a cultural shaper. To me, this video reinforces certain views even more than it appears to simply reflect a reality. Increasingly it seems that techno-cultures reverse the (albeit perhaps falsely traditional) order of things, mistaking representation for reality, and assuming that reality must follow the patterns set forth by representations. In other words, people look at images or reflections (and history counts in this schema) to see how to act in the present. This gets at your college conundrum, which is completely understandable to me: on the one hand, college education seems to be a sort of passive initiation into a 'normal' (if also entirely hegemonic) lifestyle; on the other hand, college education seems to hold the promise of a life that can question, respond intelligently to, and even *change* what has been accepted as 'normal'. This is most certainly a tension that is healthy to feel—even when it seems like it is nearing a breaking point, what this probably means is that you are stepping more confidently into a proactive stance that is unsettled by whatever 'expectations' you are picking up on (whether these be family, national, regional, or professional). I guess I am saying that all this hard thinking can only help you "break the silence and challenge injustices for the good of others." You are already very good at this, and I have no doubt that you will continue to develop your ability to consciously and conscientiously engage this very complex world.

Christopher Schaberg said...

(Sorry about the protracted, rambling sentences in my comment! These are difficult matters to think about.)

Koy Saelee said...

Wow, in order to formulate a response to this post, I had to go to Eddy's blog to view the video and read his post about it, and then read Carol's post -- I don't know if Chris realizes that he has devised a good method of getting people to read other people's post in assigning this response post requirement.

Back to my point, I really enjoy your post and share much of the same thoughts about the issue of discrimination and that if possible at all, the most effective way to achieving equality is through racial and cultural awareness. However, if we do not question about racial differences and express our thoughts about it, how would we learn about other people's culture? Thus, Carol has a point in saying that people should express their opinions -- just not in a violent, offensive or harmful way. But can this even be done and if it can not be done, should we just not question or be curious about race differences? But in not acknowledging that there is racial differences and discriminations and that people to feel negatively about others be perpetuating it?